U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Performance Management Handbook (Appraisal) - Chapter 8

Chapter 8. Monitoring Employee Performance

In an effective organization, assignments and projects are monitored continually. Monitoring well means consistently measuring performance and providing ongoing feedback to employees and work groups on their progress toward reaching their goals.

Progress Review

At a minimum, rating officials must conduct quarterly (Q) progress review with each of their employees. The Q2 review will serve as the mid-year review for the appraisal period with written feedback required for employees. The post Q4 review will serve as the year-end appraisal review with a written evaluation required for the employees. Employees may also request (or supervisors may schedule) additional progress reviews.

Employee Responsibilities

Prior to the progress review meeting with his or her rating official, the employee is strongly encouraged to submit written documentation of his or her accomplishments since the last formal performance meeting with his or her rating official.

Discussion

At each progress review, the following occurs:

  • A discussion about the employee's progress toward meeting elements included in his or her performance plan and how that progress is measured against the achievement of the organizational goals;
  • The identification of any performance deficiencies and recommendations on how to improve;
  • A review of the plan to determine the need for changes in the plan based on changes in responsibilities;
  • A discussion of the developmental/training goals or objectives; and
  • The rating official documents any changes to the original performance plan, signs and dates the revision, and provide a copy of the revised plan to the employee. 

Both the rating official and employee should date and initial the performance plan to indicate the progress review took place. 

Performance Deficiencies 

A rating official must act promptly when performance declines and should not wait for a quarterly progress review to intervene. If performance on any critical element falls below a Level 3, the rating official must document the issue, provide specific examples, and clearly state in writing what is required to reach an acceptable level.  

A progress review must be initiated by the rating official if an employee's performance on one or more critical elements falls below Level 3. A Level 1 rating requires a written Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), consistent with 5 U.S. Code (U.S.C.) Chapter 43. A PIP should be limited to 30 calendar days. While a Level 2 rating does not require a PIP, it is highly recommended that the rating official develop a written plan to assist the employee in improving performance to Level 3. 

The PIP should generally last no more than 30 calendar days. An employee can be placed on a PIP at any time, and it does not have be during an appraisal period provided that the appraisal standards have not changed.  

If the employee does not improve their performance to an acceptable level during the PIP period, the supervisor may propose a reduction-in-grade or the removal of the employee. The employee is entitled to 30 day’s advance written notice of the proposed action, to be represented by an attorney or other representative, a reasonable time to answer orally and in writing, and a written decision on the proposed action. 

If the employee’s performance reaches an acceptable level during the PIP period but subsequently declines in the same critical element(s) within 1 year from the PIP issuance date, the Agency does not have to utilize a PIP and may proceed with a proposed action of reduction of grade or removal.

Rating officials should consult with their servicing human resources office (SHRO) to determine if this review should serve as the beginning of the formal opportunity period to improve performance required by 5 U.S.C. 4302(b)(6).

Rating officials may also, in consultation with the SHRO, take action under 5 U.S.C. Chapter 75 to address unacceptable performance or misconduct. A PIP is not required under Chapter 75; however, management must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the performance is unacceptable and the assessment is reasonable. Chapter 75 may also be used to address misconduct, including AWOL, failure to follow instructions, insubordination, or similar conduct 

Effective performance management requires continuous communication, timely intervention, and consistent documentation. By fulfilling these responsibilities, supervisors and employees contribute to individual success and support the achievement of the Department’s mission-critical objectives. 

Employee Development

In an effective organization, employee developmental needs are evaluated and addressed. Developing in this instance means increasing the capacity to perform through training, giving assignments that introduce new skills or higher levels of responsibility, improving work processes, or other methods. Providing employees with training and developmental opportunities encourages good performance, strengthens job-related skills and competencies, and helps employees keep up with changes in the workplace, such as the introduction of new technology.

Carrying out the processes of performance management provides an excellent opportunity to identify developmental needs. During planning and monitoring of work, deficiencies in performance become evident and can be addressed. Areas for improving good performance also stand out, and action can be taken to help successful employees improve even further.

Updated: June 30, 2026